tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2949467606786725531.post7312115983772287223..comments2023-06-15T15:48:15.327+01:00Comments on Sceptical Rants: Sins Ain't What They Used to BeStephen Bainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17042496235288616270noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2949467606786725531.post-11039908982631470562008-03-12T05:28:00.000+00:002008-03-12T05:28:00.000+00:00They had to add more sins because abortion is one ...They had to add more sins because abortion is one of the "greatest sins of all time," and I can't see where falls under the original 7. Of course paedophilia falls under both the original "lust" and (I think) the new vague "violation of...human nature." I also haven't figured out how I would go about inflicting poverty even if I wanted to. Embezzle from the middle class?<BR/><BR/>The article seems to indicate that these new ones are in addition to the old ones, so there must be 14 (somewhat overlapping) deadly sins now. Shoot! I thought I was going to be able to eat all I wanted and angrily sit around doing nothing while lusting after Hugh Laurie and being envious of his wife without going to hell.Lauriehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00682513110485580000noreply@blogger.com